AUTHORED BY: ADITYA PANDEY
INSTITUTION: NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY ODISHA (2022-27)
INTRODUCTION
Our society is changing with a ticking clock, from finding women in households to holding a dominating position in the workforce, from restricting the liberty of women to giving them free hand to enjoy their living space, from making the decision for women to let them make the decision for the whole society, a lot has changed. As the great saying, “Freedom and Liberty come with Casualties” which means, providing freedom and liberty, unrestricted in nature, can be threatening to the whole society but here, in this case, it is not the society under the threat, it is the women whose dignity is under the threat. The threat has been more aggravated by the revolution that takes place to provide a base for women in the workspace. To protect working women in the workspace, the government of sovereign states has brought some legislation but the legislation doesn’t seem to fulfill its very aim as the workspace is still not very safe for women, even in the 21st century.
WOMAN: THE PREY
Indian constitution grants its citizen the right to equality, providing men and women equal footing in the workspace. Workspace is not only a source of income for women, but it is also much more than that, as it provides an opportunity for women to stand on their own feet and open a gate that takes them out of the dependency circle. However, it is not a cakewalk. Women have to take on their dignity. Like society, sex discrimination has its root in the workplace and sometimes this discrimination operates by shaping itself in form of sexual harassment. This not only adversely affects the woman mentally and physically, but also violates her fundamental rights guaranteed under ARTICLE 19(1)(g), subject to some restrictions. It further adds to woman's livelihood and productivity, by affecting it negatively and also compounding the situation that has already been deep-rooted in socio-cultural patterns.
People have debated over the liberty and freedom that has been provided to women with time as a major cause of their exploitation and harassment, and often indulge in discussion to limit their rights but limiting a particular group of a society, or taking away their rights is never a solution to any problem. Before the revolution, including women in the workspace, there were cases of sexual harassment, and woman's dignity was prone to threats. Moreover, the workspace is not the only place where a woman is under threat. Major chunks of sexual harassment cases take place outside of the workplace, sometime in their own home. Therefore, restricting women from the workplace will never be a reasonable way to deal with the problem.
INDIAN GOVERNMENT STEPS TO CURB HARASSMENT
AT WORKPLACE
In India, the total count of woman workforce in rural and urban areas is around 25.5% and 14.9% respectively with the majority of the workforce working in the informal sector. To provide a safe environment for women, the Indian government came up with legislation in the year 2013 under the title “THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION, AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013” which is popularly known as POSH act. The Act aims to uproot sexual discrimination against women in the workspace by taking appropriate measures. According to the POSH Act, "sexual harassment" refers to any inappropriate sexual behavior, whether explicitly stated or implied. This includes unwanted physical contact and advances, requests for or demands of sexual favors, remarks with overtly sexual undertones, the display of pornographic or other objectionable material, and inappropriate sexual behavior that is manifested through physical, verbal, or nonverbal actions. An internal committee, known as the Internal complaint committee (ICC), should be set up at each branch of an organization having a count of ten employees or more to address the cases related to sexual harassment in the workplace. The internal complaint committee compromise of a presiding officer and members. In order to make the committee female-friendly, the presiding officer and half of the committee strength should be female, thus, leaving no space for hesitation before reporting the complaints. Any inquiry, regarding the complaint, must be conducted by the Presiding officer and other two or more ICC members.[1]
The POSH act also made some provisions to be compulsorily followed by the employer such as
HOW THE POSH ACT HAS CHANGED THE SCENARIO
AND ITS DRAW BACK
From the day of enactment, the POSH act has played a major role not only in containing sexual harassment in the workplace but also in decreasing the cases of harassment. The act has provided a platform for women to voice up against their mistreatment at the workplace and at the same addressing their grievances. Settlement of ICC at each and every organization, with a capacity of ten or more employees, has sent a message to the masses about the secureness of the workplace, thus, encouraging women to participate by showing their potential. However, the act is still not enough to eliminate the evil of sexual harassment from the workplace. There are some drawbacks that need to be rectified as soon as possible to make the workplace safer and more secure for women. Some drawbacks are as follows
CONCLUSION
Women make up the majority of the world's population, but because of biases and gender disparities, they are often put in a range of unfavorable situations. They have been subjected to abuse and exploitation by civilizations that are controlled by men. Sexual harassment of women at work breaches their human and constitutional rights as well as their sense of dignity and self-worth. The POSH act has played its part flawlessly in containing the sexual harassment cases, now it is high time to revalorize the situation of women in the workplace, providing them safe and secure atmosphere, equal pay, respect, etc. by rectifying the loopholes of the act and spreading awareness among masses.
[1] Aakarsh Saluja, Mudit Gosain & Pranav Mahajan, Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (POSH Act 2013), 21 Supremo Amicus [769] (2020).
Authors: ADITYA PANDEY
Registration ID: 102239 | Published Paper ID: 2239
Year : Jan-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 10
Doi Link :