Open Access Research Article

EXAMINING THE COMPLEX RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATE GOVERNANCE AND HINDU TEMPLES IN INDIA: A CALL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CLARITY BY: MS. TANVI MALPANI

Journal: White Black Legal ISSN: 2581-8503 Published: 2023/09/02 Volume: 2 Issue: 15
Author(s) MS. TANVI MALPANI
Journal White Black Legal Law Journal
ISSN 2581-8503
Publication Date 2023/09/02
Access Type Open Access
Volume 2
Issue 15

Abstract

[1] Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Policy Note 2022-23, www.tn.gov.in, 2022, https://www.tn.gov.in/documents/dept/32.

[2] Hindu Temples and Mutts form part of Hindu Religious Endowments.

[3] The Department is headed by a Commissioner appointed by the Government. The Commissioner is generally a person belonging to the State Judicial Services or other Services (Section 9 of the Tamil Nadu Act) and acts as a servant of the Government (Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Act)

[4] Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, § 7(1)(a), No.22 Act of Tamil Nadu, 1959 (India).

[5] Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, § 92 (1), No.22 Act of Tamil Nadu, 1959 (India).

[6] Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, § 92 (2), No.22 Act of Tamil Nadu, 1959 (India).

[7] The Karnataka Hindu Religious Institution and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997

[8] Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987

[9] Kerala has four legislations: the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950; the Koodalmanickam Devaswom Act, 1971; the Guruvayoor Devaswom Act, 1978; Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2008

[10] Appointed under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950

[11] The Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951

[12] The Orissa Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1969

[13] Constituted under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959

[14] Under the Bihar Hindu Religious Trusts Act of 1950

[15] Commissioner Hindu Religious Endowments v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Shirur Mutt (A.I.R. 1954 SC 282)

[16] Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. The State of Bombay and Others, 1954 SCR 1035.

[17] A.I.R. 1958 SC 255

[18] A.I.R. 1963 SC 1638

[19] A.I.R. 1966 SC 1119

[20] A.I.R. 1984 SC 51

[21] 2018 (8) SCJ 609

[22] During the 2018 Shabarimala Case, Justice Chandrachud was not the Chief Justice of India

Full Text PDF

The full text of this research paper is available as an open-access PDF. Readers may view, download and cite the article using the details provided on this page.

Journal Information

Journal White Black Legal
ISSN 2581-8503
Access Open Access
Language English

Licensing & Disclaimer

All research articles published in White Black Legal Law Journal are open access and may be read, downloaded and shared with proper citation.
The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of White Black Legal Law Journal.

Indexing Partners

  • Manupatra
  • Google Scholar
  • ISNI
  • Journal Indexing
  • Publication Indexing
  • ROAD
  • Academic Indexing
  • Advanced Indexing
  • CiteFactor
  • DRJI
  • HeinOnline
  • International Indexing
  • ISI