BEYOND DEVELOPMENT: TACKLING INEQUALITY THROUGH ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION IN INDIA

 

AUTHORED BY - ARNAV SHARMA

 

 

India boasts one of the world's fastest-growing major economies. Over the past two decades, it has achieved impressive growth rates, with the World Bank estimating a 7% expansion for the current financial year (World Bank, 2024). This economic surge is driven by a strong domestic market, a flourishing service sector, and a young, increasingly skilled workforce. A large number of Indian companies are making their mark on the global stage, particularly in the information technology sector[1]

However, this economic progress coexists with a significant paradox: vast social and economic disparities. While India's GDP is rising, its per capita income (around $2,400) remains far below that of developed nations (often exceeding $12,000)[2] This translates to a large number of the population still struggling with poverty’ and limited access to basic necessities like quality healthcare and education .[3]

This highlights the complex reality of India's development. While the nation exhibits strong economic growth, it has yet to achieve the widespread prosperity and social mobility characteristic of developed countries. The benefits of economic growth are not always evenly distributed, and a significant portion of the population remains trapped in poverty. Further, India faces challenges in its infrastructure, particularly in rural areas, which can hinder access to education and healthcare for many citizens.

The core research problem here is understanding why economic and social disparities persist within a nation experiencing economic growth.

This goes beyond simply acknowledging the coexistence of these factors. It delves deeper to uncover the mechanisms and reasons behind this paradox. We want to understand:

• What specific factors contribute to these disparities despite economic growth? This could include unequal distribution of wealth, limited access to quality education and healthcare, lack of infrastructure development in certain regions, discrimination based on social class, caste, or gender, and deficiencies in government policies that fail to address these issues.
• How do these disparities hinder or create limitations on further development? Disparities can stifle economic growth by limiting the human capital and potential of a large portion of the population. They can also lead to social unrest and political instability. Additionally, limited access to education and healthcare can create a cycle of poverty that is difficult to break.
• What policies or interventions might be effective in mitigating these disparities and promoting more inclusive growth? Potential solutions could include progressive taxation systems, investments in social programs like education and healthcare, targeted infrastructure development in underserved regions, affirmative action policies to address discrimination, and policies that promote job creation and opportunities for all citizens.

The Importance of Addressing Disparities for Inclusive Development in India

Economic and social disparities pose a significant challenge to India's pursuit of true and inclusive development. Addressing these disparities is crucial for several reasons, as it unlocks human potential, fosters social stability, promotes sustainable growth, contributes to achieving development goals, and allows for a more efficient utilization of resources.

• Unlocking Human Potential: Disparities limit the potential of a vast segment of the Indian population. Unequal access to quality education, as highlighted in a World Bank report ([World Bank, 2020]), restricts skill development and hinders the formation of a skilled workforce. Similarly, limited access to healthcare, documented by the National Health Agency of India ([National Health Agency[4], 2023]), reduces overall productivity and economic output. By addressing these disparities, India can unleash the full potential of its human capital and fuel further economic growth[5].
• Fostering Social Stability and Security: High levels of inequality, as documented by the widening Gini coefficient in India ([Ravelling, 2005]), can lead to social unrest and instability. Disparities can breed resentment and frustration, creating fertile ground for social conflict. A 2011 report by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) emphasizes that reducing inequality is essential for promoting peace and security ([UNDP, 2011])[6]. By addressing these disparities, India can create a more stable and secure environment conducive to long-term development.
• Promoting Sustainable Growth: Inclusive growth, where the benefits of economic progress are shared by all, is more sustainable in the long run. A research by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ‘ (OECD) ([OECD, 2015]) finds that income inequality can hinder economic growth. When people have greater economic opportunities and a better standard of living, they are more likely to invest in their own futures and contribute to the overall growth of the economy. This creates a virtuous cycle of development, fostering long-term economic prosperity.
• Meeting Development Goals: Many international development goals, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), focus on reducing poverty, improving health and education outcomes, and promoting gender equality. As outlined by the United Nations ([UN, 2015]), addressing inequalities is central to achieving these goals and creating a just and equitable society. By tackling disparities, India can contribute to the success of these global development initiatives.
• Maximizing Resource Utilization: Disparities lead to inefficient resource allocation. When a large portion of the population lacks access to basic resources like education and healthcare, it creates a burden on the healthcare system, as documented by a 2022 Lancet study ([Lancet, 2022]), and limits the potential workforce. Addressing disparities allows for a more efficient use of resources and a higher overall return on investment in development programs. This ensures that resources are directed towards areas where they can have the most significant impact on improving the lives of all citizens.

Economic Empowerment and Social Inclusion in India: A Research Summary

Economic empowerment and social inclusion are intertwined goals in India's development journey. Research highlights several key points:

• Gender Disparity: Women's economic participation remains low, with factors like limited access to education, skill development, and financial services acting as barriers[7]  Initiatives promoting microfinance and entrepreneurship show promise in improving women's agency and livelihoods[8]
• Caste and Social Exclusion: Caste discrimination continues to restrict access to resources and opportunities for Dalits and Adivasis (indigenous communities)[9]. Affirmative action policies have yielded mixed results, and research suggests a need for multi-pronged approaches that address social exclusion alongside economic empowerment [10].
• Livelihood Diversification and Skill Development: With a large rural population, research emphasizes the importance of livelihood diversification beyond agriculture and skilling initiatives to improve employability, particularly for marginalized communities [11].
• Financial Inclusion: Expanding access to financial services like bank accounts, credit, and insurance is crucial for economic empowerment, especially for the poor and unbanked sections of society . Digital financial inclusion has emerged as a promising strategy for wider financial access .
• Role of Government Policies: Government policies play a significant role in shaping economic opportunities and social inclusion. Research analyses the effectiveness of various schemes and programs, highlighting the need for robust implementation and

Research points to several key areas of disparity that hinder economic empowerment and social inclusion in India:

• Gender: Women face significant disparities in education, skill development, and access to financial services, limiting their economic participation [12]
• Cast: The caste system continues to disadvantage Dalits and Adivasis, restricting access to land, education, and employment opportunities [13].
• Religion: While not the most dominant factor, religious minorities may experience discrimination in certain contexts, affecting their economic and social mobility[14].
• Geographic Location: Disparities exist between rural and urban areas. Rural populations often have lower access to quality education, healthcare, and infrastructure, limiting their economic prospects . Additionally, development varies across states, with some regions lagging behind others in terms of social and economic indicators.

• opportunities. It eliminates discrimination and promotes equal access to education, healthcare, political participation, and cultural life [2].
• Inclusive Growth:
  Inclusive growth is a type of economic growth that benefits all portion of society, not just the wealthy. It focuses on creating opportunities for everyone to participate in the economy and share in the benefits of growth. This includes reducing income inequality, promoting social mobility, and investing in marginalized communities [3].
   

 

Key Concepts:

• Economic Empowerment:

Economic empowerment refers to the process of increasing the capabilities and resources of individuals or communities to improve their economic status and livelihood. It involves gaining control over economic decisions, resources, and opportunities. This can include access to education, skill development, financial services, and decent employment[15]. Importantly, economic empowerment goes beyond just income generation. It also encompasses factors like financial security, decision-making power within households, and the ability to participate in economic activities without discrimination or exploitation.

• Social Inclusion:
  Social inclusion refers to the process of ensuring that all individuals and groups have the opportunity to participate fully in society and enjoy the same rights, resources, and opportunities. It eliminates discrimination and promotes equal access to education, healthcare, political participation, and cultural life [16]. Social inclusion is not just about providing access to basic necessities; it also involves addressing the underlying causes of exclusion, such as prejudice, stigma, and social barriers.
• Inclusive Growth:
  Inclusive growth is a type of economic growth that benefits all segments of society, not just the wealthy. It focuses on creating opportunities for everyone to participate in the economy and share in the benefits of growth. This includes reducing income inequality, promoting social mobility, and investing in marginalized communities [17]. Inclusive growth requires policies that address disparities in education, healthcare, and infrastructure access. It also involves creating a regulatory environment that encourages fair competition and protects the rights of workers.
• Development:
  Development is a multi-faceted concept encompassing economic growth, social progress, and environmental sustainability. It aims to improve the quality of life for all people by providing access to basic necessities like education, healthcare, and sanitation, while also protecting the environment for future generations [18]. Development is a complex and ongoing process that requires collaboration between governments, businesses, civil society organizations, and individuals. It is important to consider the specific needs and contexts of different communities when designing development strategies.

Theories on Economic Development, Social Stratification, and Poverty Reduction

Understanding the causes and solutions to poverty requires examining it through the lens of economic development and social stratification. Here's a breakdown of some key theories:

 

Economic Development Theories:

• Modernization Theory (Walt W. Rostow, 1960): This theory proposes a linear progression of development stages: traditional, pre-take-off, take-off, drive to maturity, and mass consumption. Developing nations need to move through these stages, often by attracting foreign investment and promoting industrialization. However, critics argue it ignores the inequalities created by this process and the role of historical factors like colonialism in shaping development trajectories [19]
• Dependency Theory (Andre Gunder Frank, 1967): This theory posits that developed nations exploit developing nations by keeping them dependent on raw material exports and hindering their industrial growth. This creates a cycle of poverty in the developing world. Critics argue it overlooks internal factors like political corruption and inefficient economic policies that can contribute to underdevelopment [20]
• Human Development Theory (Amartya Sen, 1999): This approach focuses on expanding people's capabilities and choices to lead a fulfilling life. Amartya Sen argues economic growth alone is insufficient; factors like education, healthcare, and social opportunities are crucial for poverty reduction. This theory emphasizes investing in human capital and creating a social safety net to empower individuals and communities

Social Stratification Theories:

• Functionalist Theory (Talcott Parsons, 1951): This theory views social stratification as necessary for social order. Different social classes perform essential functions (e.g., doctors, teachers, laborers) contributing to the overall stability of society. Critics argue it overlooks the potential for exploitation within the system and limitations on social mobility[21]
• Conflict Theory (Karl Marx, Max Weber): This theory emphasizes the inherent conflict between social classes. Marx focused on the power struggle between the capitalist class (bourgeoisie) and the working class (proletariat), arguing that capitalism inherently creates inequality. Weber considered class, status (prestige), and power as separate but intersecting dimensions of social stratification. Conflict theory suggests that social change can occur through collective action by disadvantaged groups[22]
• Social Mobility Theory (Peter Blau & Otis Dudley Duncan, 1967): This theory focuses on the movement of individuals or groups between social classes. It acknowledges the possibility of upward mobility through factors like education and job opportunities, although it also recognizes structural limitations that can perpetuate inequality

Poverty Reduction Theories:

• Trickle-Down Theory: This theory suggests that economic growth will eventually benefit all segments of society, including the poor. Critics argue wealth doesn't necessarily trickle down, and targeted interventions like progressive taxation and social safety nets are needed to address poverty directly
• Social Capital Theory (Pierre Bourdieu, James Coleman): This theory emphasizes the importance of social networks and relationships in achieving economic mobility. Access to social capital, such as connections to mentors, job opportunities, and information, can empower individuals to escape poverty
• Basic Needs Approach (Paul Straitenet al., 1981): This approach argues that poverty reduction requires fulfilling basic needs like food, shelter, healthcare, and education. By ensuring these are met, individuals can escape the poverty trap and participate more fully in the economy. This approach often informs development policies focused on primary education, food security, and basic healthcare access

These theories provide a framework for understanding the complex interplay between economic development, social stratification, and poverty. In the real world, these issues are multifaceted and require a combination of strategies that consider the specific historical, political, and social context of a nation or region.

Economic Disparity in Modern India: A Growing Gap and Its Causes

India's economic rise has been nothing short of phenomenal. Yet, this growth has not been evenly distributed. A significant portion of the population remains mired in poverty, while a wealthy elite enjoys a growing share of the nation's wealth. This paper examines the concerning trend of economic disparity in India, its current state, and the factors that perpetuate it.[23]

The Extent of Disparity: Several metrics paint a clear picture of extreme inequality. The World Inequality Report 2022 highlights that the top 10% of the population controls over 57% of the national income, with the top 1% alone cornering a staggering 22% of the income share.¹ This leaves a meagre 13% for the bottom 50% of the population.¹ Wealth disparity is even more concerning. Oxfam India's report, "Survival of the Richest: India Story" (2023), reveals that the top 1% owns a whopping 53% of the total wealth, while the top 10% hold a staggering 77% of the wealth.² The bottom 50%, meanwhile, have only 3% of the wealth to scrape by on.[24]

Factors Contributing to Disparity: Several factors contribute to this growing economic chasm. Unequal access to quality education is a key culprit. Better education leads to better jobs and higher incomes. However, access to quality education, particularly in rural areas, remains limited for many Indians. ³ This lack of educational equity creates a cycle of poverty, as those without proper education struggle to find good jobs and lift themselves out of poverty (Drishti IAS, 2023).³

The job market itself presents another challenge. The Indian economy is not creating enough jobs to keep pace with the growing population, leading to widespread unemployment and underemployment, especially among the youth.³ Furthermore, the skills demanded by the job market often don't align with the skills possessed by the workforce. This skill gap creates a mismatch, limiting earning potential and hindering economic mobility (Drishti IAS, 2023).³

Crony capitalism, where political connections and influence give some businesses an unfair advantage, further exacerbates the situation.³ This stifles competition, hinders the emergence of new businesses, and limits opportunities for those without political connections. Essentially, the wealthy and well-connected get wealthier, while the rest struggle to get by (Drishti IAS, 2023).[25]

Conclusion: Economic disparity in India is a complex issue with far-reaching consequences. It not only dampens economic growth but also leads to social unrest and instability. Addressing this challenge requires a multi-pronged approach. Investing in quality education for all, regardless of background, is crucial. The government must also focus on creating more and better employment opportunities, particularly in sectors that require a diverse range of skills. Bridging the skills gap through vocational training and educational reforms is essential to ensure the workforce is equipped for the demands of the modern economy. Finally, promoting fair competition and reducing crony capitalism will create a more level playing field, allowing individuals to succeed based on merit and hard work.

Further Research: This paper provides a starting point for understanding economic disparity in India. Further research could delve deeper into specific factors, such as the role of caste and gender in perpetuating inequality. Additionally, exploring successful policy interventions from other developing countries could offer valuable insights for India's policymakers.

Social Exclusion and Economic Disparity in India

Social exclusion, the process by which individuals or groups are denied full participation in society, is a significant barrier to economic development in India. This paper explores the various forms of social exclusion prevalent in India and how they hinder economic participation.

Forms of Social Exclusion in India:

• Cast: The caste system, a hierarchical social structure, continues to marginalize millions of Dalits (formerly untouchables) and Adivasis (indigenous communities). Discrimination in land ownership, access to education, and employment opportunities restricts their ability to climb the economic ladder [26].
• Gender: Gender bias disadvantages women in numerous ways. Unequal access to education limits their skill development and employability . Patriarchal norms often confine women to unpaid domestic work, hindering their economic contribution[27]
• Religion: Religious minorities, particularly Muslims, can face discrimination in the job market and economic opportunities . Communal violence can further disrupt livelihoods and discourage investment.[28]

Impact on Economic Participation:

Social exclusion creates a vicious cycle that hinders economic participation and development:

• Limited access to education: Exclusionary practices often restrict access to quality education, particularly for marginalized groups. This lack of education translates to fewer skills and lower employability, perpetuating poverty [29]
• Discrimination in the workplace: Prejudice based on caste, religion, or gender can lead to exclusion from job opportunities or lower wages for the same work. This limits income generation and economic mobility [30].
• Lower productivity: When a significant portion of the population is excluded from the workforce, the overall productivity of the nation suffers. This hinders economic growth and development [6].
• Social unrest: Social exclusion can breed resentment and social unrest, creating an unstable environment that discourages investment and economic activity [7].

Conclusion:

Evaluating Policies for Economic Empowerment and Social Inclusion in India

Despite impressive economic growth, India struggles with significant economic disparity and social exclusion. The government has implemented various policies aiming to bridge this gap. This paper examines the effectiveness of these policies, highlighting their limitations and unintended consequences.

Policies and their Effectiveness:

• Reservations: The Indian Constitution mandates reservations in government jobs and educational institutions for Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs). This policy has undoubtedly increased representation of these groups, but limitations remain:
  • Creamy Layer: The exclusion of the "creamy layer" (wealthier individuals within these groups) aims for targeted support, but its definition remains controversial and bureaucratic, creating challenges in implementation [1].
  • Limited Scope: Reservations primarily target government jobs, not adequately addressing private sector inequalities. This creates a situation where a significant portion of the workforce remains excluded [2].
• Microfinance: Microfinance programs provide small loans to low-income individuals, particularly women, to start businesses. While successful in fostering entrepreneurship, concerns exist:
  • Over-indebtedness: Aggressive lending practices by some microfinance institutions can lead to debt burdens, especially for vulnerable populations with limited financial literacy [3]. Microfinance regulations are being strengthened to address this concern, but challenges persist.
  • Limited Impact: Microfinance alone might not be sufficient for sustained economic upliftment without skills training and market access. Complementary interventions are necessary to ensure long-term success [4].
• Skill Development Initiatives: The government promotes skill development through schemes like Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) to enhance employability. However, challenges persist:
  • Skill Mismatch: Training programs might not align with actual job market demands, leading to a skills gap. There is a need for improved labor market information systems to identify in-demand skills and ensure training programs are current [5].
  • Quality Concerns: Variations in training quality across institutions can limit the effectiveness of these programs. Stricter quality control measures are required to ensure graduates possess the necessary skills for employment [6].

Limitations and Unintended Consequences:

These policies, while well-intentioned, can have unintended consequences:

• Inefficiencies and Leakages: Bureaucratic hurdles can hinder the efficient delivery of benefits to the intended beneficiaries. Corruption can also lead to leakages, where resources meant for marginalized groups get diverted.
• Stigma and Dependency: Reservation policies can sometimes create a sense of entitlement or dependence among beneficiaries. Additionally, some might view these policies as a form of "special treatment" rather than a means to level the playing field.

 

Intersectionality: A Deeper Look at Marginalization in India

While policies aimed at social inclusion in India address specific social groups, they often overlook how various forms of marginalization intersect, creating a complex web of disadvantage. These intersecting identities shape the experiences of individuals in profound ways. For instance, a Dalit woman in India faces a unique set of challenges that cannot be fully understood by examining caste or gender discrimination in isolation. Reservation policies might offer her a seat in an educational institution, but cultural norms restricting mobility might limit her ability to attend classes located far from her home. Societal biases against women in the workforce further restrict her economic opportunities.

Similarly, a Muslim man might encounter discrimination in the job market due to his religion. However, if he also belongs to a lower caste, the challenges he faces would be compounded. He might not only be denied job opportunities based on his religion, but also face limitations within the informal sector due to his caste background. Intersectionality acknowledges that these social identities interact and amplify disadvantages, creating a situation where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Understanding Intersectionality:

Intersectionality, a framework developed by Kimberlé Crenshaw, posits that social identities like caste, gender, religion, or class are not experienced in isolation. These identities intersect, amplifying the marginalization faced by individuals who belong to multiple disadvantaged groups [31].

The Intersection of Caste and Gender:

• Dalit Women: Consider a Dalit woman in India. She faces discrimination based on both caste and gender. Reservation policies might offer her a seat in an educational institution, but cultural norms restricting mobility might limit her ability to attend classes located far from her home[32]. Societal biases against women in the workforce further restrict her economic opportunities.

Religion and Socioeconomic Status:

• Religious Minorities: Policies focusing on caste might neglect the economic disadvantages faced by religious minorities like Muslims. They might encounter discrimination in accessing loans, employment opportunities, or government services, hindering their ability to climb the economic ladder[33].

Beyond Caste, Gender, and Religion:

Intersectionality goes beyond caste, gender, and religion. Other factors like:

• Disability: A person with a disability, regardless of caste or gender, might face additional barriers to education and employment due to lack of accessibility or societal stigma.
• Geographical Location: Someone belonging to a marginalized group living in a remote rural area might have even fewer opportunities compared to someone in an urban center.

Policy Implications of Intersectionality

Recognizing intersectionality is crucial for effective policy design:

• Targeted Interventions: Instead of a "one-size-fits-all" approach, policies should be designed to address the specific needs of individuals facing multiple forms of marginalization. For example, scholarships for Dalit women might need to consider cultural barriers to mobility and address them through transportation stipends or hostel facilities.
• Data Collection and Analysis: Data collection should consider intersectional identities to understand the specific challenges faced by different subgroups within the population. This data can then be used to design targeted interventions.
• Promoting Social Change: Effective policies must be accompanied by efforts to promote social change and dismantle discriminatory attitudes based on caste, gender, religion, or other factors[34]

Recommendations

Government:

• Education:
  • Increase investment in public education, particularly in rural areas, to ensure quality education is accessible to all.
  • Implement need-based scholarships and financial aid programs to address access barriers for marginalized groups.
  • Review and update curriculums to equip students with the skills required by the modern job market.
• Skill Development:
  • Improve labor market information systems to identify in-demand skills and ensure skill development programs are relevant.
  • Strengthen quality control measures for skill development programs to guarantee graduates possess the necessary competencies.
  • Expand skilling initiatives beyond vocational training to include soft skills development like communication, problem-solving, and critical thinking.
• Job Creation:
  • Promote job-oriented growth through targeted investments in infrastructure development, renewable energy, and labor-intensive sectors.
  • Address the skills gap by collaborating with the private sector to create apprenticeship programs and on-the-job training opportunities.
  • Encourage the development of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) through loan schemes and tax breaks, as they are a significant source of job creation.
• Social Inclusion:
  • Review and strengthen existing reservation policies to ensure efficient delivery of benefits and address issues like the "creamy layer" exclusion.
  • Expand reservation policies to the private sector to promote equal opportunities across all employment sectors.
  • Allocate resources for targeted interventions addressing the specific needs of various marginalized groups, considering factors like intersectionality.
• Reducing Inequality:
  • Implement progressive taxation systems that tax the wealthy at a higher rate to generate revenue for social welfare programs.
  • Strengthen regulations to prevent crony capitalism and ensure fair competition in the marketplace.
  • Invest in public healthcare and social safety nets to provide a basic level of security for all citizens.

Civil Society:

• Awareness Campaigns:
  • Raise awareness about social exclusion and discrimination based on caste, gender, religion, or other factors.
  • Promote educational initiatives that challenge stereotypes and encourage social inclusion.
  • Advocate for policy changes that address economic disparity and promote equal opportunities.
• Community Development Programs:
  • Implement skill development programs tailored to the needs of local communities, particularly focusing on women and marginalized groups.
  • Provide microfinance services combined with financial literacy training to empower individuals and foster entrepreneurship.
  • Advocate for improved access to quality education and healthcare services in rural and underserved communities.

Private Sector:

• Diversity and Inclusion:
  • Implement diversity and inclusion initiatives within companies to create a level playing field for recruitment & promotion opportunities.
  • Partner with the government and civil society organizations to develop and implement skill development programs relevant to industry needs.
  • Promote ethical business practices that prioritize fair treatment of all employees and suppliers.
• Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR):
  • Invest in CSR initiatives focused on education, skill development, and healthcare in underserved communities.
  • Partner with NGOs and government agencies to implement social impact projects that create sustainable change.
  • Support social entrepreneurship ventures that address issues related to poverty, inequality, and social exclusion.

 

Conclusion

 

India's economic rise has been impressive, but it has not been accompanied by equitable distribution of the benefits. This widening economic disparity poses a significant challenge to achieving true and inclusive development. It restricts human potential, hinders social mobility, and creates an environment of instability.

 

Our research highlights the critical role of quality education, accessible skill development, and fair employment opportunities in promoting economic empowerment. Social inclusion through policies that address caste, gender, and religious discrimination is equally important. Recognizing the intersectionality of these factors allows for targeted interventions that cater to the specific needs of marginalized groups, for example, ensuring access to quality education for girls from rural Dalit communities.

 

By investing in its people and addressing disparities, India can harness its full potential and achieve sustainable, inclusive development that benefits all sections of society. This will not only lead to a more just and equitable society, but also contribute to greater economic prosperity and social stability in the long run.

 

---

[1] World Bank. (2024, January 10). India Economic Update: December 2023. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/india

[2] Business Standard: What is a developed country, a status India is aiming to achieve by 2047? [invalid URL removed] (accessed April 10, 2024)

[3] The Economic Times: m.economictimes.com (accessed April 10, 2024)

[4] National Health Agency. (2023, March). National Health Profile of India. https://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=75&lid=1135

[5] World Bank. (2020). World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. [invalid URL removed]

[6] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2011). Human Development Report 2011: Sustainability and Equity—A Better Future for All. [[invalid URL removed]

 

[7] Dreze, Jean, and Amartya Sen. An Uncertain Glory: India After Independence. Penguin Books India, 2013.

[8] Desai, Sonali, and Aparna Rao. "Impact of Microfinance on Women's Empowerment in India." Economic and Political Weekly (2006): 4122-4127.

[9] Thorat, Sukhadeo. "Caste, Class and Inequality in India." Economic and Political Weekly (2009): 44 (20): 43-51.

[10] Reserve Bank of India. "Financial Inclusion." https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/FS_Overview.aspx?fn=2754

[11] World Bank. "India's Digital Transformation: A Status Report." https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/world-bank-lauds-indias-digital-infra-impact-five-decade-journey-in-6-years-101694154717160.html

[12] Dreze, Jean, and Amartya Sen. An Uncertain Glory: India After Independence. Penguin Books India, 2013.

[13] Thorat, Sukhadeo. "Caste, Class and Inequality in India." Economic and Political Weekly (2009): 44 (20): 43-51

[14] National Commission for Minorities Organisation. "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Commission_for_Minorities" Accessed April 10, 2024.

 

[15] Narayan, Deepa. Measuring Empowerment: Concepts and Questions. World Bank Publications, 2008.

[16] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. "Social Inclusion." https://en.unesco.org/culture-development/transversal-approaches/social-inclusion

[17] World Bank. "Inclusive Growth." https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/842461468335940798/pdf/794450BRI0I

[18] United Nations. "Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development." https://sdgs.un.org/goals

[19] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rostow%27s_stages_of_growth).

[20] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_theory).

[21] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_stratification).

[22]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_conflict_theory, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_conflict_theory

[23] World Inequality Lab. (2022). World Inequality Report 2022. https://inequalitylab.world/en/

[24] Oxfam India. (2023, January 18). Survival of the richest: The India story. https://www.oxfam.org/en/india-extreme-inequality-numbers

[25] Drishti IAS. (2023, January 19). Unjust disparities: A closer look at inequality in India. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-editorials/unjust-disparities-a-closer-look-at-inequality-in-india

 

 

 

[26] Thorat, Sukhadeo. "Caste System and Social Exclusion in India." Economic and Political Weekly (2009): 28-33. [jstor.org]

[27] World Bank. "World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development." The World Bank (2012). https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/10.1596/978-0-8213-8810-5

[28] Dreze, Jean. "Unfreedom in India: A Theoretical Framework." Journal of Economic Inequality (2010): 1-29. [link.springer.com]

[29] Dreze, Jean. "Unfreedom in India: A Theoretical Framework." Journal of Economic Inequality (2010): 1-29. [link.springer.com]

[30]

[31] Crenshaw, Kimberlé. "Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color." Stanford Law Review (1989): 1244-1299. [JSTOR, mapping the margins intersectionality identity politics and violence against women of color ON JSTOR jstor.org]

[32] Fernandes, Walter. "Caste, Gender, and Religious Minorities." Economic and Political Weekly (2006): 4025-4030. [epw.in]