A STUDY ON THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL BANKING
AUTHORED BY - ABHIRAJ VAIDYA
Once India's Commercial Banks were nationalized, the concept of social banking emerged. The goal is to build a coordinated monetary framework with public engagement, capable of efficiently reacting to a range of administration strategy goals while keeping a robust capacity to withstand local political constraints. The major purpose is the distribution of assets to the ineligible, the removal of restrictive infrastructure of personal business houses and corporate families on banks, the countrywide growth of banking, and the reduction of regional imbalances. Administrative and political changes precipitated a backlog in this system, which became a weapon for vote-bank politics, significant corruption in the implementation of plans, and bad planning. Significant losses were experienced by banks and economic entities as a result of nonrecovery of loans and a drop in credit flow. The crisis was handled by the implementation of alternative ideas, such as the Financial Inclusion concept. It was done to ensure that every person and family has access to financial services, resulting in the economic growth of the nation. So, the notion of development may be ensured not only by the availability of credit, but also by the inclusion of financial services such as input access, financial knowledge, skills, and technology.
India is a welfare state whose policies strive to provide a socialistic way of life for its citizens. After achieving independence, the nation established a mixed economy with a robust public sector and crucial private sector enterprises. These sectors include the country's social, economic, and welfare sectors. The advancement of the nation's economy consists of the financial sectors. The financial sector consists of banks, cooperatives, and financial institutions. The banking industry is a vital component of the nation's economy. It strives to fulfill fundamental social and economic objectives and avoid monopolistic tendencies, concentrations of power, and wasteful resource use.
With the State Bank of India Act of 1955, the Imperial Bank of India was nationalized and renamed "State Bank of India" in 1955. It was tasked with acting as the RBI's chief agent and handling banking transactions throughout the nation. In 1960, seven subsidiary banks of the State Bank of India were nationalized. The V. V. Pai Anandikar Report to the Indian government underlined the problem that new entrepreneurs and enterprises were unable to get appropriate loans from banks. The banks have failed to accommodate the needs of farmers and small business owners. In light of these flaws, the study suggested societal control of banks as a remedy. Social regulation of banks was anticipated to -
The result was the 1967 Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill. Nonetheless, fourteen large private banks and six additional banks were nationalized between 1969 and 1980, respectively. To attain the socialistic purpose established in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution, the goal was to have them concentrate their operations toward the advancement of society, rather than focusing on profits. By 1980, about 80% of the banking industry in India was owned by the government. Following nationalization, the Indian banking sector saw extensive branch development, particularly in rural and semi-urban regions, under the Lead bank plan, Service Area Approach, and other initiatives. All of these advancements originated essentially from the socializing of banking. Despite the fact that these advancements made financial services more accessible to the public, particularly the disadvantaged segments of society, there was a rising worry about the decline of banking services. The primary purpose was to regulate the heights of the economy, meet progress, and better serve the demands of economic development in accordance with national policies and goals.
After the introduction of the New Economic Policy in 1991, the Indian government created the Narasimham Committee[1] to offer suggestions about the restructuring of India's commercial banks. As a consequence of the ideas, the Banking Regulatory Act was changed in 1993, allowing additional private sector banks to open their doors. These nationalized bank branches practice what is known as social banking. Social banking supports a direct influence of credit on the distribution of income, so ensuring social welfare, in contrast to the commercial banking system, which focuses more on profit maximization, efficiency, and economic progress. Thus, banks are now expected to serve as social banking tools with sustainable profitability.
From 1977 to 1979, Commercial Banks were instructed to establish four branches in unbanked rural regions for every branch established in a metropolitan or port location. From June 1969 to December 1985, the total number of Commercial Bank branches increased from 8262 to 52,398. (counting 12,606 Regional Rural Bank offices). The number of natural branches increased from 1833 to 30,944.
The methodology used in the research is collection of secondary data from the various sites. The data has been taken from the various internet sources and journals. The data was collected and then was compiled to make this paper.
In his paper titled "Social Obligation" of Banks, (Kumara Raj. A)[2] explains that the social duty of business refers to the paramount concern that a firm should have for pluralist society in its pursuit of profit-making activities, entailing the sacrifice of profit in order to help society.
According to Roy-Sapre (2016), "many studies have claimed that access to financial tools, such as banking services and investment opportunities, improves the quality of life, particularly for the poor and disadvantaged." Notwithstanding this, there should be a clear distinction between developed and emerging nations. In underdeveloped nations, the primary objective of social finance and banking is to assist the people escape poverty, but in rich countries, the objective is to help the population attain a greater degree of social development.
The avowed business purpose of social banks is not to maximize profits (Scheire and Martelaert, 2009). Their objectives center on their function as servants and facilitators of the actual economy. They use their unique position as money allocators to "promote the public interest" (Institute for Social Banking 2011).
Given the objectives of social banks vary from traditional (banking) business, it is thought that social bankers need "special competencies" in addition to their banking and financial knowledge to do their jobs effectively (Cabarrubia 2010; Kühn 2005).
Social banking was characterized by Dr. Roland Benedikter[3] as "banking with a conscience." The primary objective of the banking industry is to invest in local communities, provide freedoms to the oppressed, and assist social, ecological, and moral planning. Banks are presently focused on achieving a triple focus on profit, people, and the environment. Social finance is the main point of the many activities of commercial banks aimed at achieving a socialistic model of society via the uplift of the poor and disadvantaged. For instance, government-sponsored loan programs and disbursement objectives for disadvantaged sections. The state's function here is to affect credit distribution by socioeconomic class.
The three main objective of social banking are –
The development of social banking in India may be roughly divided into three phases:
During the First Phase (1960-1990), i.e. the nationalization of banks, the primary emphasis was on providing credit to the ignored sectors, particularly the poorer parts of society, via branch multiplication and Priority Sector Lending.
The focus of the Second Phase (1990-2005) was primarily on strengthening the monetary foundations as part of monetary area adjustments. During this time period, Self-Help Groups (SHG), the Bank Linkage Program, and Kisan Credit Cards were introduced (KCC). Then, in 1992, NABARD, with the backing of the Reserve Bank of India, launched the Self- improvement Gathering Bank Linkage Program to assist the poor in strengthening their cohesion and gaining easy access to banking.
During the third stage, beginning in 2005, monetary incorporation was widely performed on a public level, with a focus on providing vital financial services via NFAs.[4]
Middle-income and low-income families in rural and urban regions need access to a broad variety of services, including skill development, insurance, savings, access to inputs, and remittances, suggesting that the government implement a formal policy of financial inclusion.[6] While the objectives of social banking and financial inclusion are similar, i.e., to achieve welfare objectives and socialistic goals, an important distinction between the two is that the inclusive credit financial inclusion model also aims to provide households with full access to a full suite of financial services, whereas social banking only aims to provide households with access to a limited number of financial services. It involves two major projects –
This is done in support of social banking, i.e. to increase banking access. The government requirement compelled banks to open branches in all villages with a population of 2,000 to 3,000 and at least one resident citizen. In 2005, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) mandated that banks provide No Frills Accounts with zero or low minimum balance requirements. The RBI initiated the idea of Business Correspondents in 2006.[7]
On August 15, 2014, the Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) was started. According to the idea, every resident in the nation, regardless of economic level, will be required to have a bank account or at least one bank account per home. In addition to the loan facilities, it will assist consumers combat money laundering. In addition, account holders would get a RuPay Debit Card and a Rs 1,000,000 accident insurance coverage. In addition to creating the account, providing financial education is a crucial component of the purpose. Beneficiaries of the program will be equipped with the information required to use the financial services made accessible to them. Institute for Development & Research in Banking Technology (IDRBT) and National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) are consistently contributing to the banking sector by introducing innovative technological products. One such solution is the Core banking system, which encouraged the usage of NEFT, RTGS, Internet Banking, Mobile Banking, and ATMs. In addition, the newest innovations, such as e-KYC, AEPS, and IMPS, mobile banking, and electronic wallets, will assist the nation's underserved population realize its full potential. In the past, several committees have been created to focus on financial inclusion. Recent recommendations by the NachiketMor committee have opened the door for RBI to license new sorts of banks, including Small Finance Banks and Payments Banks. A committee report by Deepak Mohanty entitled Medium-term route on financial inclusion describes a five-year action plan for financial inclusion that is measurable.
In various markets, shares are valued based on a variety of factors, but a basic premise is that a share is worth the amount that its sale would likely cost. Market liquidity is a crucial aspect in deciding whether a share may be sold at any given time. Typically, the actual sale of shares between a buyer and a seller is regarded as the best first market signal of the "true value" of shares at any particular time. Typically, shares are issued fully paid, in which case the obligation of the shareholders is limited to the amount paid for the shares; nevertheless, shares may alternatively be issued partly paid, in which case the liability of the owners is limitless, subject to guarantee, or in some other manner. We buy and sell shares on the stock exchange because shares represent ownership interests. In the simplest one-person business, shares are superfluous since there is no sharing of anything. Yet, sharing becomes feasible if a second party is engaged. Shareholders often own companies, and each shareholder owns a fixed number of shares. The maximum number of shares that may be issued is the entire number of authorized shares. Issued shares are shares that have been allotted by the board of directors, shareholders, or both. Treasury shares are issued shares that have been repurchased by the corporation; they often lack voting and dividend rights. The total number of outstanding shares owned by shareholders is the sum of issued shares. The equity capital of a company consists of its issued shares. Some firms are required by law to maintain a minimum level of equity capital, while others may demand none or just a small amount. The value of issued shares is determined at the time of issuance and stays constant in relation to the issuing entity throughout time. Typically, shares are issued fully paid, in which case the obligation of the shareholders is limited to the amount paid for the shares; nevertheless, shares may alternatively be issued partly paid, in which case the liability of the owners is limitless, subject to guarantee, or in some other manner.
[1] Justice Narasimham Committee on banking sector reforms report submitted in April 1998
[2] Kumara Raj. A (1990) Social obligation of Commercial Banks, Ph.D Thesis, Annamalai University, India, p. 63
[3] Dr. Roland Benedikter, Social Banking and Social Finance Answers to the Economic Crisis (2011)
[4] Deepak Pant Joshi, Social Banking – Promise, Performance and Potential, Foundation Books (2012)
[5] Desai. S.S.M., Rural Banking in India, Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House (1979)
[6] Arundati Bhattacharya, The Journal of Indian Institute of Banking and Finance, July- September (2015)
[7] Partha Sarathi Senapati, Financial Inclusion through Social Banking in India, Volume 6, International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 317-321 (2016)
Authors: ABHIRAJ VAIDYA
Registration ID: 103025 | Published Paper ID: WBL3025
Year : July-2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 16
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
DOI Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2024-46765869/A STUDY ON THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL BANKING