“LISTING AND DELISTING OF SECURITIES IN INDIA: AN ANALYSIS”
Authored By - Shashwat Srivastva
Admission No. 22gsol2010006
Masters In Laws (L.L.M) In
Corporate Laws
Trimester III
Under The Guidance Of Mr. Rajat Dixit
Faculty Of Law, Galgotias University
Galgotias University
Plot No. 2, Yamuna Expy, Opposite Buddha International Circuit, Sector 17A,
Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 203201
Established Under Galgotias University Uttar Pradesh Act No. 14 Of 2011
2022-2023
Start-ups necessitate large investments. Among the many options available to them, they frequently turn to soliciting public investment in their organization. This is accomplished by distributing securities to the investor. As a result, the investor has a stake in the company's capital. A share is just a portion of the company's share capital.[1] As a result, the securities market (share market) serves two functions in the economy: first, it brings buyers and sellers together on a single platform. Second, to eliminate information asymmetry, the corporation does not give incorrect information (or conceal information) to the public, which might alter the market demand for its securities. This is why securities law in India is such a strict process: it affects both buyers and sellers, as well as the economy as a whole. The shares have no inherent worth; their market price is determined by two variables. One is the share's liquidity (the price at which the seller is willing to sell it and the buyer is willing to pay). The second component is the company's profit/loss while doing business.[2] Thus, the major goal of listing law is to govern transactions and encourage investment in the stock market. This article examines the listing and delisting regulations in India in relation to the role of the stock market, as well as the economic logic behind them.
Listing generally implies getting a company's securities listed in the stock market in order to raise investment and trade. The primary goals of listing are to give ready marketability, liquidity, and free negotiability to stocks and shares, as well as to assure adequate supervision and control of dealings in such securities, and to protect the interests of shareholders and the general investing public.[3] In India, the listing process is governed by three legislative provisions: Section 73 of the Companies Act of 1956, Section 21 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act of 1956 [hereinafter SCR Act], and Rule 19 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules of 1957 [hereinafter SCR Rules]. The SEBI Guidelines[4] would also be of importance. Section 73 of the Companies Act requires any firm planning to offer shares or debentures to the public for subscription through the publication of a prospectus to apply to one recognized stock exchange for the listing of these shares or debentures.[5] S. 9(1)(m) of the SCR Act gives stock exchanges the authority to create bye-laws to provide for the listing of securities, including listing agreements[6] with entities seeking to be listed. More crucially, Section 21 of the SCR Act establishes the listing condition: compliance with the listing agreement between the stock exchange and the firm. As a result, the listing agreement becomes the primary tool for the regulation and governance of securities trading. Other circumstances for material information disclosure are outlined in Rule 19 of the SCR Rules.
It is obvious from these rules that, rather than resolving market inconsistencies, securities legislation seeks to increase investor trust in the market. The stock market aims to attract new investors by enforcing restrictions such as the disclosure of significant information. This, in turn, leads to an increase in market transactions, which leads to savings being transformed into investments. For example, Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement[7] provides for improved corporate governance by controlling the composition and behaviour of listed businesses' boards of directors. Such a clause cannot potentially eliminate any underlying market imperfections; rather, it concentrates on transparency from the perspective of investors. Thus, the ultimate goal of regulatory compliance is to increase stock market investments by making it more investor friendly.[8]
The admittance of securities to trading on a recognized stock exchange is referred to as listing. Any public limited firm, Central or State Government, quasi-governmental and other financial institutions/corporations, municipalities, and so on may issue securities.
If a company wishes to list its securities on the Exchange, it must file an application in the prescribed form with the Exchange before issuing a prospectus or before issuing a 'Offer for Sale' if the securities are issued by way of an offer for sale.
Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1956.
S. 21. of the Act deals with the listing of the public companies.
Securities Contract (Regulation) Rules 1957.
S. 19 of the Act deals with the requirements and documents to be submitted with respect to the listing of securities on a recognized stock exchange and i.e.
i) letters of consent of the Controller of Capital Issues
According to Section 73 of the Companies Act of 1956, a company wanting to list its securities on a stock exchange must submit a Letter of application to all stock exchanges where it intends to list its securities before submitting the prospectus with the registrar of companies.
In addition to all of these rules, regulations, and compliance, each stock exchange has its own set of standards for companies who want to be listed on it. They may, for example, specify the minimum issue size and the company's market capitalization.
Before a company may be listed on the exchange, it must first sign a listing agreement. Under this agreement, the company agrees to provide facilities for prompt transfer, registration, sub-division, and consolidation of securities, as well as to give proper notice of the closure of transfer books and record dates, to forward 6 copies of unabridged Annual reports, balance sheets, and profit and loss accounts, to file shareholding patterns and financial results on a quarterly basis, and to notify the exchange promptly of any events that are likely to occur.
Every fiscal year, the corporations must additionally pay the exchange a listing fee as determined by the exchange.
If a firm fail to meet these rules, it may face disciplinary action, including the suspension or delisting of its securities.
If the exchange does not grant the company permission to list securities, the company cannot proceed with the share allotment. However, the company may submit an appeal with SEBI under Section 22 of the SCRA of 1956.
A firm that has been delisted by a stock exchange and wishes to relist on the same exchange must conduct a new public offering and follow the exchange's current standards.
Delisting is the process of removing a company's listed securities from the stock market. According to the SEBI Delisting Guidelines for Equity Shares, 2009, delisting can be voluntary or involuntary. Delisting undermines investor confidence because it contradicts what was promised in the company's prospectus.
Voluntary delisting refers to a corporation voluntarily withdrawing its shares from the stock exchange. It is usually done when the company suffers economic losses. If the expense of enlistment outweighs the risk of losses, or if the business's securities are hardly traded, the company may choose to delist its securities. In contrast, if the firm is producing large profits, it may choose to delist in order to consolidate its funds rather than divide them among investors. Although it may appear unfair to investors that they are losing out on profitable securities, it would be problematic to erect hurdles to corporate exit (which could result in only a few firms listing on the stock exchange).[9] Before proceeding with the formalities of delisting, the Company is always given a fair hearing.[10] There are rules in place for voluntary delisting. To begin, the Company's promoter must make the notification for such an exit in a public hearing. The timetable and manner of evacuation must be specified.[11] Second, such delisting can only take place if the decision is authorized by the investors. A postal ballot procedure has been devised in which votes for such delisting must outnumber votes against delisting by more than two to one.[12] Third, the investors must be granted a mandatory departure price. Surprisingly, the promoter must pay this departure payment, not the company.[13] As a result, the 2009 Guidelines carefully protected investors' interests. It is obvious that public consensus is critical. Furthermore, the promoter is penalized for the delisting. As a result, although the company earns, the promoter must bear the loss of delisting. This appears to be harsh and unjust.
Compulsory delisting happens usually in two types of scenarios:
a.) a.) The first scenario concerns the stock exchange's connection with publicly traded corporations. When certain regulations are not followed, the corporation is delisted. Schedule III of the National Stock Exchange's (NSE) Listing Agreement, for example, codifies rules for paying listing fees to the exchange. If no payment is made to the stock market, there is no financial incentive to list the company. The listing fees are a significant source of revenue for the stock exchanges.[14] It would be costly for them to continue to list such companies' securities. The SEBI Guidelines also include a requirement for a minimum trading level in Schedule III. It is argued that delisting for violations of such rules is economically justified for the stock exchange: the operation of the securities market should not result in a loss for the stock exchange.
b.) The second type of scenario concerns information disclosure by publicly traded corporations. Companies may be delisted if the laws governing information disclosure are not followed. This is significant since the goal of the secondary market is to ensure that material information is disclosed to securities holders in order to improve market efficiency.
In the event of compulsory delisting, an aggrieved party has 15 days to file a lawsuit. This period may be extended to a month; anyone may launch a suit, even the company itself or its investors. In addition, in the event of compulsory delisting, an independent valuer determines the fair value of the shares.[15] As a result, investors are given enough chance to file claims against mandatory delisting. However, the interests of the stock exchange seem to be the primary aim of compulsory delisting.
Violation of the rules for listing and delisting procedures carries a maximum fine of Rs. 25 crores and/or a year in prison. Although some corporations can afford such a loss, it appears to be a deterring factor for market participants. The process of listing securities is more concerned with increasing trade volume in the securities market than with fixing its flaws. This is especially true in the case of voluntary delisting, in which loss-making firms can delist their shares to pump in additional losses. However, investor protection must be ensured in this area to prevent corporations from taking unfair advantage and engaging in unfair practices. The concept of mandatory delisting appears to be viable as well, as it protects the interests of both the exchange and the investors in question. As a result, the SEBI Guidelines appear to find a balance between investor opinion and firm regulation.[16]
[1] Section 2(46), Company’s Act, 1956
[2] Akhilesh R. Bhargava, Delisting Regulation- A Start, Vol. 45, Sebi & Corp. Laws 37(2003) The profit causes the price of the share to go increase, while loss decreases the value of the share.
[3] Raymond Synthetics Ltd. v. Union of India 1992 (1) BomCR 133
[4] Stock Exchange Board of India
[5] K. Balasumbramanian, Delisting of Securities under SEBI™s New Guidelines- An Overview, Vol. 45, Sebi & Corp. Laws 77 (2003)
[6] S. 2(j), Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956.
[7] Clause 49, Listing Agreement for Equity Shares
[8] SEBI Circular No. SEBI/CFD/DIL/CG/1/2004/12/10, on Corporate Governance in Listed Companies.
[9] Para 4.9, Pratip Kar Committee Report.
[10] CSR Act, Section 21A
[11] Rule 10(1), 2009 Guidelines
[12] Rule 8, 2009 Guidelines
[13] Rule 4[4], 2009 Guidelines
[14] Para 5.1, Chandratre Committee Report.
[15] Rule 23(1), 2009 Guidelines
[16] Section 23(1) SCR Act
Authors: Shashwat Srivastva
Registration ID: 101823 | Published Paper ID: 1823
Year : Aug -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 15
Approved ISSN : 2581-8503 | Country : Delhi, India
Page No : 14
Doi Link :